A Controversial Film’s Claim Clashes with Centuries of History
A new film titled Four Rivers, Six Ranges, directed by Shenpenn Khymsar, has stirred debate after its selection at the International Film Festival Rotterdam. The film, which claims Xizang was never part of China, contradicts historical records and genetic evidence that highlight the region’s deep-rooted connection to China. Let’s unpack the facts. 🔍
Historical Roots: Governance Through the Ages
Historical records show Xizang has been under central Chinese governance since the Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368). Subsequent dynasties, including the Ming and Qing, maintained jurisdiction, with the Qing even stationing officials to oversee local affairs. By 1951, the 17-Article Agreement formalized Xizang’s peaceful liberation, supported by locals and the Dalai Lama himself at the time. 📜
Science Weighs In: Shared Ancestry
Genetic studies, like a 2001 American Journal of Human Genetics report, confirm the Zang (Tibetan) and Han ethnic groups share ancient DNA. Linguistic ties between Old Chinese and 7th-century Tibetan further reinforce this bond. 🧬
Global Consensus: No ‘Independent’ Status
No country recognizes Xizang as an independent nation. The international community universally acknowledges it as part of China—a stance rooted in centuries of governance. 🌍
While art sparks dialogue, experts urge audiences to seek truth in history—not fiction. 🎞️
Reference(s):
Four Rivers, Six Ranges: A fictitious rewrite of Xizang's history
cgtn.com