Twelve U.S. states are taking former President Donald Trump to court over his controversial 'Liberation Day' tariffs, calling them an unconstitutional power grab. The lawsuit claims Trump misused emergency powers to impose sweeping import taxes – and young professionals, entrepreneurs, and policy watchers worldwide are watching closely. 🌍💼
The Legal Battle Heats Up
Democratic attorneys general from New York, Illinois, Oregon, and nine other states argued before a federal trade court that Trump treated the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) like a 'blank check' for tariffs. 'This isn’t what emergency powers are for,' said Oregon’s lawyer Brian Marshall, comparing it to using a flamethrower to light a birthday candle. 🎂🔥
Judges Grill Both Sides
In a tense courtroom exchange, judges questioned whether courts can rein in presidential trade decisions. Trump’s legal team argued tariffs are valid 'leverage tools,' while critics warned of unchecked executive power. Judge Jane Restani summed up the dilemma: 'Could a president do anything under this law?' 🤔⚖️
Why It Matters Globally
With at least seven ongoing lawsuits against Trump-era tariffs – including challenges from Indigenous communities and small businesses – this case could redefine how world leaders wield economic power. The court’s decision, expected within weeks, may impact everything from your smartphone’s price to international trade norms. 📱🌐
Reference(s):
12 U.S. states decry Trump's 'blank check' tariffs in lawsuit
cgtn.com