The UN Security Council (UNSC) has finally united—sort of—on a plan to address Gaza's deepening crisis. Resolution 2720, adopted on December 22, demands urgent humanitarian aid delivery and hostage releases. But with the U.S. and Russia abstaining and no ceasefire agreement, does this move signal progress or political deadlock? Let's unpack it. 🔍
What’s in the Resolution?
The resolution pushes for:
🚚 Speeding up aid to Gaza civilians via a new UN coordinator.
🩺 Medical access for hostages and their unconditional release.
✌️ Renewed support for a two-state solution, linking Gaza and the West Bank under Palestinian Authority control.
But here's the catch: No binding ceasefire clause. Russia’s proposed amendment for an immediate truce was vetoed by the U.S., sparking criticism from Moscow. 💥
Mixed Reactions, Same Old Divides
The vote revealed familiar fractures:
🇨🇳 China backed the resolution, urging Israel to halt military strikes and "collective punishment."
🇺🇸 The U.S. praised hostage-release demands but refused to condemn Hamas’ October 7 attacks.
🇵🇸 Palestine called the resolution a "step forward," while Israel insisted on maintaining strict aid inspections.
It’s the second UNSC resolution since October 7—and like past efforts, its success hinges on cooperation from warring parties. Spoiler: That’s not guaranteed. 🛑
A Glimmer of Hope?
More aid will likely reach Gaza due to mounting global pressure. But with Israel vowing to keep military operations and inspections in place, many wonder: Is this enough to stop the suffering? 🤔
