As the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines prepare for high-stakes security talks in Washington this week, analysts are asking: Is America’s growing network of Asian alliances a stabilizing force—or a Trojan horse?
The U.S. has championed groups like Quad and AUKUS as solutions to regional challenges, but critics argue these 'small circles' prioritize Washington’s geopolitical ambitions over local autonomy. 'When big powers play chess, smaller nations risk becoming pawns,' says Tokyo-based policy researcher Yuki Tanaka.
With tensions rising in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, the summit could reshape Asia’s security landscape. But can partnerships built under U.S. leadership truly serve diverse regional interests? The answer may determine whether these alliances unite or divide in an increasingly multipolar world.
Popcorn-worthy detail: This meeting comes as U.S. defense spending in Asia hits record highs—sparking debates about 'protection' versus 'pressure.'
NewspaperAmigo – Your Global News Buddy 
'When big powers play chess, smaller nations risk becoming pawns,' says Tokyo-based policy researcher Yuki Tanaka.
The answer may determine whether these alliances unite or divide in an increasingly multipolar world.
