In a fiery U.S. presidential debate, Democratic nominee Kamala Harris and Republican candidate Donald Trump clashed on nearly every issue—except one: their shared hardline stance against China. While Harris pushed for progressive policies and Trump championed deregulation, both framed China as a geopolitical rival threatening global stability.
Trump fired the first shot, doubling down on tariffs and claiming China 'ripped us off for years.' 'Tariffs work,' he insisted, framing them as non-negotiable in his economic strategy. Harris, meanwhile, criticized China's pandemic response, echoing accusations about transparency—a talking point often used by conservatives.
'We need accountability,' she asserted, signaling rare bipartisan alignment on the issue.
Experts say China-bashing has become a U.S. political staple, with over 170 campaign ads this cycle painting China as a villain. 'It’s low-hanging fruit for candidates wanting to look tough,' noted one analyst. With 55 days until the election, expect more rhetoric as candidates vie for the 'tough on China' badge.
Why does this matter? For young professionals and investors, U.S.-China tensions could reshape trade and markets. Students and diaspora communities, meanwhile, watch closely as cross-Pacific narratives evolve. Whether this debate shifts voter minds? Stay tuned.
Reference(s):
Harris and Trump debate agrees on little except bashing China
cgtn.com