As the world gears up for the Paris Olympics, a glaring contradiction in anti-doping enforcement is stealing the spotlight . The US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has greenlit sprinter Erriyon Knighton’s Olympic bid despite a positive test for trenbolone – while Chinese swimmers faced relentless scrutiny over similar allegations, revealing what critics call a \"reckless double standard.\"
Throwing shade: Earlier this year, 23 Chinese swimmers were cleared by WADA after traces of a banned substance were traced to tainted kitchen surfaces at their hotel . Despite independent verification, Western media and athletes like Britain’s Adam Peaty accused China of foul play – even as Team China dominated the pool
.
Plot twist: Fast-forward to July, and USADA claims Knighton’s positive test was likely due to contaminated meat – a justification met with eye-rolls globally. China’s anti-doping agency CHINADA blasted the move as hypocrisy, noting WADA had already validated China’s handling of its cases.
\"Why the discrepancy?\" asks Zhang Yufei, a Chinese swimmer subjected to 3-4 weekly tests post-allegations. IOC data confirms China’s team underwent 600+ tests in 2024 alone – yet their victories were shadowed by suspicion.
Bigger picture: The IOC warns politicizing anti-doping could destabilize global sports governance. With US officials threatening Salt Lake City’s 2034 Winter Games bid over WADA disputes, critics argue America’s selective outrage risks turning the Olympics into a geopolitical battleground .
As CHINADA stated: \"Pointing fingers won’t hide America’s own doping history.\" The world is watching – and fair play hangs in the balance.
Reference(s):
US double standard on anti-doping is reckless, self-defeating
cgtn.com